09-03-2006, 03:50 PM
|
#19 (permalink)
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: PALAKKAD
Posts: 14,261
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by deepak
Hi friends, nice topic. But I dont think KC can be compared to NS. Nair Saab is not at all a military movie. It is just a film taken in a military background. It doesnt deal with the actual problems that our nation is facing. Its a masala mix, remember the comedy scenes of Mukesh and party. Such scenes can be seen in overproportion in NS. Maybe they did that eyeing commercial success. But KC is a film that deals exclusively with the issue of terrorism. The film successfully gives the viewer a description of the situation in Kashmir and the problems faced by the soldiers. The dialogues are also very revealing, for example, there is this dialogue by a terrorist 'We dont consider Indian muslims as muslims'. Such dialogues are really crisp and the viewer can identify with the film easily. NS doesnt have even a single dialogue that is touchy. We dont get a feeling of patriotism after watching NS. In KC the guns and machinery used are original. We can feel the difference in action scenes. The encounter scenes are perfect lasting no more than 3-4 minutes. In terms of action scenes NS is just average. Nothing new about it. Performance wise, i think Mohanlal and Mammoty are on par. But Mohanlal can be better than Mammoty in action scenes as we all know that Mammoty cannot match Mohanlal in stunts. Before the movie was released Mammoty fans were booing Mohanlal saying that he cant do such a role. But Mohanlal came up with an excellent performance. He handles all the languages with ease and his dialogue delivery is fantastic. And about the bulky physique of Mohanlal, we have to remember that military is not about appearance. Its all about intelligence and quickness. Mohanlal was very fast in his encounter movements. So there is no point crtitisising him on his physique. Remember that the physicaly fit Mammoty didnt do anything better in action scenes of NS compared to Mohanlal in KC. And the success of KC is more superior to that of NS. Remember that in KC except Mohanlal there is no other prominent malayalam star who are crowd pullers. But NS is packed with prominent stars like Mukesh, Suresh, LaluALex, Devan, Raju etc. On the whole, NS cannot be compared to KC. KC is rooted in reality much more than NS.
|
WHAT U MEAN BY PROMINENT STARS.ON WHAT BASIS U ARE TELLING MUKESH , SURESHGOPI LALU ALEX ARE PROMINENT ACTORS THAN JEEVA, BIJU MENON , SHAMMITTHILAKAN, COCHIN HANEEFA , SAIKUMAR. PLEASE AVOID THIS TYPE OF RUBBISH COMMENTS. EVN KEERTHI CHAKRA HAVING SOME UNNECESSARY MASALA SCENES ( UNNECESSARY RAPE SCENES) AND SOME UNWANTED FIGHTS KEERTHICHAKRA'S TAMIL REMAKE FAILED IN TAMIL BOX OFFICE WHEREAS WHEN NAAIRSAAB DUBBED IN TAMIL, IT WAS BIG HIT. THAT MEANS TAMILANS APPRECIATED JOSHI'S TECHNICAL PERFECTION THAN THAT OF MAJOR RAVI. AND THAT OF MAMOOTY'S ACTING THAN MOHANLAL . EVEN MOHANLAL'S BIBLE SIFY CRITICISED THAT VULGAR RAPE SCENE IN KEERTHICHAKRA |
|
|