CMPRISON OF KRTICHAKRA WITH OTHER MLTRY MS. SCAND CM REV-P13 - Page 2

Abhi · 09-03-2006, 03:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LalSalam

Quote:

Originally Posted by sethu

(1) Good review by Hisham..keep it up.
He has pointed out some interesting points
like the similarity with other films (or COPY)

(2) How can we compare KC with Nairsaab??
Nairsaab is not a Military Movie..its a pakka
commercial action movie with comedy and love tracks..

So comparing KC with Nairsaab and saying KC is better military movie than Nairsaab is stupidity....

You can compare KC with Border and somany other military movies.

APPOL AMARAM & MS evide mammu fans compare cheythatho.

PLS MANNUNIES ASNWER THIS??? WHER IS SETHU???? WHY DONT U ASK THIS QUEST. TO MANNUNIES......

GK · 09-03-2006, 03:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Aravind Mohan Krishnan

My comparison of Nair Saab v Keerthi Chakra

I was waiting for such a topic to compare both films.

Both are very difficult to compare because

1. Both came in different eras
2. Mammoty is not a general throughout like Mohanlal
3. Mammoty and Mohanlal's characters have different styles and are characterised differently-so impossible to compare them
4. Keerthi Chakra can be called a military film. But Nair Saab is more of an action thriller in the 2nd half rather than a military film.

If I were to state my opinion, I would go for Keerthi Chakra for the following reasons

1. A true military film should NOT have unnecessary comedy or love scenes (Aran has that, but KC I am talking about..). In Nair Saab a few scenes are wasted on the usual young soldiers flirting with ladies and competition as to who is the most handsome, etc etc.
2. A true national military film will NEVER have a whole batch of Malayalees, the Home Secretary being a Malayalee and the chief villains being Malayalees. One has to be realistic here. Also, in Mukesh's dream, the India-Pakistan signs are in Malayalam :roll:. In Keerthi Chakra, there are Tamilians, Maharashtrians and Afghanis and Kashmiris all speaking their various languages. This is what should happen. And unlike Nair Saab, a good 20% of Keerthi Chakra's dialogues are in Tamil, Hindi and Urdu.
3. A true military film will never ever have Mukesh, Kunjan, Maniyanpilla Raju as soldiers :lol:. Biju Menon, Shammi Thilakan, Jeeva etc are more suitable for the military uniform than the others.
4. A true military film should be an army film throughout. In Nair Saab, 20% of the 1st half is comedy and romance and 80% of the 2nd half is action and suspense. In Keerthi Chakra, 90% of the film is devoted to training and commando operations and tactics.
5. A true military film should have atleast some patriotic dialogues and words to remember, eg where Major Mahadevan says "Yudham kalikumbozhum cricket kalikannumbol mathram nammal Indiakar avila". Nair Saab does not even have 1 patriotic dialogue or even "Bharat Mata Ki Jai"
6. A true military film should deal with issues in the military rather than outside. In Nair Saab u have the army being infiltrated by villains and Lalu Alex acting as a general, whereas in KC there are more pertinent issues such as the human rights of killing a prisoner, the sacrifices a soldier makes, none of which are dealt with in Nair Saab.
7. In Nair Saab soldiers do not have an identity to speak of themselves. In KC each soldier has his complex mannerisms and we can have a detailed look at the problems he faces. In Nair Saab soldiers follow the general (Mammoty or Lalu Alex)

Some points in favor of Nair Saab

1. Kashmir has been captured brilliantly even though it is 1989.
2. Though not a military film as such the suspense and action is racy and entertaining
3. Mammoty is outstanding as Nair Saab and his performance can really intimidate the audience. His dialogues are brilliant and he ssymbolises a true major.
4. The training manouvres are interesting to see in Nair Saab.

So I feel KC as a military film is better. My own opinion only. Sorry to Mammotyfans.

STILL U DIDNT REPLY TO MY REAL QUESTION REGARDING MAJOR RAVI 'S COPYING OF SOME SCENES AND CHARACTERS FROM OTHER MILITARY MOVIES LIKLE BORDER, SAVING PRIVATE RYAN. SAME MISTAKE OF NAAIR SAAB IS REPEATING KEERTHI CHAKRA ALSO. ALMOST TOP OFFICIALS LIKE SAIKUMAR, SPADIKAM GEORGE ARE MALAYALEES. NO REPLY REGARDING SANUSHA SPEAKING MALAYALAM FLUENTLY. I ALSO MENTIONED LANGUAGE PROBLEMS REGARDING 90'S . NO REPLY TO THAT ONE ALSO. AND WHAT U MEAN BY TRUE MILITARY FILMS NEVER EVER LIKE KUNJAN , MUKESH. DONT BLAME -THAT SEEMS CHILDISH COMMENT.LIKE KAIRALI SAYING SAKSHI SAYING BIJUMENON UM SHAMMITHILAKANUM KOMBUNDO. IF UARE SAYING LIKE THIS I CAN ALSO SAY THAT MOHANLAL'S BODY STRUCTURE ALSO NOT SUITABLE FOR ARMY OFFICER .U DIDNT REPLY REGARDING ADDING OF UNNECESSARY FIGHT SCENES IN THE FILMS. AND NAAIRSAAB'S CLIMAX IS FAR BETTER THAN KEERTHICHAKRA. FROM WHERE U GOT THE DEFINITION OF TRUE MILITARY FILM. BORDER IS CONSIDERED AS BEST MILITARY FILM IN INDIA, STILL THAT FILM IS MIXTURE OF ROMANCE, COMEDY AND ACTION.
NAAIR SAAB AND MAJOR MAADEVAN DOING THE SAME THING SAVING THE COUNTRY FROM TERRORISTS. I AND ABOUT SEVENTH POINT IF U CHECK NAAIR SAAB ALSO WE CAN FIND THAT IT ALSO PICTURISING THE DIFIICULTIES OF SOLDIERS, LIKE THAT OF SURESH GOPI, MUKESH, VIJAYARAGHAVAN ETC

lalistheonlysuperstar · 09-03-2006, 03:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Abhi

Quote:

Originally Posted by LalSalam

Quote:

Originally Posted by sethu

(1) Good review by Hisham..keep it up.
He has pointed out some interesting points
like the similarity with other films (or COPY)

(2) How can we compare KC with Nairsaab??
Nairsaab is not a Military Movie..its a pakka
commercial action movie with comedy and love tracks..

So comparing KC with Nairsaab and saying KC is better military movie than Nairsaab is stupidity....

You can compare KC with Border and somany other military movies.

APPOL AMARAM & MS evide mammu fans compare cheythatho.

PLS MANNUNIES ASNWER THIS??? WHER IS SETHU???? WHY DONT U ASK THIS QUEST. TO MANNUNIES......

sethu eppozhum vadi koduthu adi vangunnavana

lalistheonlysuperstar · 09-03-2006, 03:26 PM

the best way is to ask neutral. everyone is saying KC is far far better. And even medias saying. what else?

GK · 09-03-2006, 03:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LalSalam

Quote:

Originally Posted by HISHAMEM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lalistheonlysuperstar

leave alone mammu and lal fans and ask neutrals.

they will tell nair sab is nothing infront of KIRTICHAKARA.

Tney will tell Lalettan's performance is 100 time better than Mammootty's nair sab role.

EVERY ONE SAYS ITS THE INDIAN CINEMA IN MALAYALAM LANGUAGE.

AND ITS THE BEST MILITARY MOVIE EVER PRODUCED IN INDIA.

I AM A LAL FAN BUT THAT DOES NOT MEAN NOT TO TELL TRUTH.

KIRTICHAKARA IS FAR BETTER.

PLEASE DONT SAY ITS BEST MILITARY MOVIE IN INDIA. TECHNICALLY ITS ONE OF THE BEST MILITARY MOVIES IN KERALA

Then tell which is the best military movie in INDIA.

BORDER IS CONSIDERED AS BEST MILITARY FILM BY CRITICS

deepak · 09-03-2006, 03:32 PM

Hi friends, nice topic. But I dont think KC can be compared to NS. Nair Saab is not at all a military movie. It is just a film taken in a military background. It doesnt deal with the actual problems that our nation is facing. Its a masala mix, remember the comedy scenes of Mukesh and party. Such scenes can be seen in overproportion in NS. Maybe they did that eyeing commercial success. But KC is a film that deals exclusively with the issue of terrorism. The film successfully gives the viewer a description of the situation in Kashmir and the problems faced by the soldiers. The dialogues are also very revealing, for example, there is this dialogue by a terrorist 'We dont consider Indian muslims as muslims'. Such dialogues are really crisp and the viewer can identify with the film easily. NS doesnt have even a single dialogue that is touchy. We dont get a feeling of patriotism after watching NS. In KC the guns and machinery used are original. We can feel the difference in action scenes. The encounter scenes are perfect lasting no more than 3-4 minutes. In terms of action scenes NS is just average. Nothing new about it. Performance wise, i think Mohanlal and Mammoty are on par. But Mohanlal can be better than Mammoty in action scenes as we all know that Mammoty cannot match Mohanlal in stunts. Before the movie was released Mammoty fans were booing Mohanlal saying that he cant do such a role. But Mohanlal came up with an excellent performance. He handles all the languages with ease and his dialogue delivery is fantastic. And about the bulky physique of Mohanlal, we have to remember that military is not about appearance. Its all about intelligence and quickness. Mohanlal was very fast in his encounter movements. So there is no point crtitisising him on his physique. Remember that the physicaly fit Mammoty didnt do anything better in action scenes of NS compared to Mohanlal in KC. And the success of KC is more superior to that of NS. Remember that in KC except Mohanlal there is no other prominent malayalam star who are crowd pullers. But NS is packed with prominent stars like Mukesh, Suresh, LaluALex, Devan, Raju etc. On the whole, NS cannot be compared to KC. KC is rooted in reality much more than NS.

Aravind Mohan Krishnan · 09-03-2006, 03:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HISHAMEM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Aravind Mohan Krishnan

My comparison of Nair Saab v Keerthi Chakra

I was waiting for such a topic to compare both films.

Both are very difficult to compare because

1. Both came in different eras
2. Mammoty is not a general throughout like Mohanlal
3. Mammoty and Mohanlal's characters have different styles and are characterised differently-so impossible to compare them
4. Keerthi Chakra can be called a military film. But Nair Saab is more of an action thriller in the 2nd half rather than a military film.

If I were to state my opinion, I would go for Keerthi Chakra for the following reasons

1. A true military film should NOT have unnecessary comedy or love scenes (Aran has that, but KC I am talking about..). In Nair Saab a few scenes are wasted on the usual young soldiers flirting with ladies and competition as to who is the most handsome, etc etc.
2. A true national military film will NEVER have a whole batch of Malayalees, the Home Secretary being a Malayalee and the chief villains being Malayalees. One has to be realistic here. Also, in Mukesh's dream, the India-Pakistan signs are in Malayalam

. In Keerthi Chakra, there are Tamilians, Maharashtrians and Afghanis and Kashmiris all speaking their various languages. This is what should happen. And unlike Nair Saab, a good 20% of Keerthi Chakra's dialogues are in Tamil, Hindi and Urdu.
3. A true military film will never ever have Mukesh, Kunjan, Maniyanpilla Raju as soldiers

. Biju Menon, Shammi Thilakan, Jeeva etc are more suitable for the military uniform than the others.
4. A true military film should be an army film throughout. In Nair Saab, 20% of the 1st half is comedy and romance and 80% of the 2nd half is action and suspense. In Keerthi Chakra, 90% of the film is devoted to training and commando operations and tactics.
5. A true military film should have atleast some patriotic dialogues and words to remember, eg where Major Mahadevan says "Yudham kalikumbozhum cricket kalikannumbol mathram nammal Indiakar avila". Nair Saab does not even have 1 patriotic dialogue or even "Bharat Mata Ki Jai"
6. A true military film should deal with issues in the military rather than outside. In Nair Saab u have the army being infiltrated by villains and Lalu Alex acting as a general, whereas in KC there are more pertinent issues such as the human rights of killing a prisoner, the sacrifices a soldier makes, none of which are dealt with in Nair Saab.
7. In Nair Saab soldiers do not have an identity to speak of themselves. In KC each soldier has his complex mannerisms and we can have a detailed look at the problems he faces. In Nair Saab soldiers follow the general (Mammoty or Lalu Alex)

Some points in favor of Nair Saab

1. Kashmir has been captured brilliantly even though it is 1989.
2. Though not a military film as such the suspense and action is racy and entertaining
3. Mammoty is outstanding as Nair Saab and his performance can really intimidate the audience. His dialogues are brilliant and he ssymbolises a true major.
4. The training manouvres are interesting to see in Nair Saab.

So I feel KC as a military film is better. My own opinion only. Sorry to Mammotyfans.

STILL U DIDNT REPLY TO MY REAL QUESTION REGARDING MAJOR RAVI 'S COPYING OF SOME SCENES AND CHARACTERS FROM OTHER MILITARY MOVIES LIKLE BORDER, SAVING PRIVATE RYAN. SAME MISTAKE OF NAAIR SAAB IS REPEATING KEERTHI CHAKRA ALSO. ALMOST TOP OFFICIALS LIKE SAIKUMAR, SPADIKAM GEORGE ARE MALAYALEES. NO REPLY REGARDING SANUSHA SPEAKING MALAYALAM FLUENTLY. I ALSO MENTIONED LANGUAGE PROBLEMS REGARDING 90'S . NO REPLY TO THAT ONE ALSO. AND WHAT U MEAN BY TRUE MILITARY FILMS NEVER EVER LIKE KUNJAN , MUKESH. DONT BLAME -THAT SEEMS CHILDISH COMMENT.LIKE KAIRALI SAYING SAKSHI SAYING BIJUMENON UM SHAMMITHILAKANUM KOMBUNDO. IF UARE SAYING LIKE THIS I CAN ALSO SAY THAT MOHANLAL'S BODY STRUCTURE ALSO NOT SUITABLE FOR ARMY OFFICER .U DIDNT REPLY REGARDING ADDING OF UNNECESSARY FIGHT SCENES IN THE FILMS. AND NAAIRSAAB'S CLIMAX IS FAR BETTER THAN KEERTHICHAKRA. FROM WHERE U GOT THE DEFINITION OF TRUE MILITARY FILM. BORDER IS CONSIDERED AS BEST MILITARY FILM IN INDIA, STILL THAT FILM IS MIXTURE OF ROMANCE, COMEDY AND ACTION.
NAAIR SAAB AND MAJOR MAADEVAN DOING THE SAME THING SAVING THE COUNTRY FROM TERRORISTS. I AND ABOUT SEVENTH POINT IF U CHECK NAAIR SAAB ALSO WE CAN FIND THAT IT ALSO PICTURISING THE DIFIICULTIES OF SOLDIERS, LIKE THAT OF SURESH GOPI, MUKESH, VIJAYARAGHAVAN ETC

Hishamem. Did I compare KC to Border in any of my points? I havent watched Border and I will never say KC is the best Indian military film, I just told that in my opinion KC is better than Nair Saab.

Copying/pasting of Hollywood or Bollywood films is not an issue for me. What matters is whether the film satisfies me as a whole. Though I know UT was rpped off from Bowfinger I thoroughly enjoyed it nonetheless. I was able to appreciate Mammu's performance in Rapakkal even though film was a copy of old Rajesh Khanna and Sivaji films.

About Mohanlal not having the appearance of a major, the important thing is he acted brilliantly (u said that anyway...). Appearance is not important. Acting is. Otherwise people like Dileep or Mani would never have made it this big in Malluwood, as Moovybuf pointed out.

And I leave it to the others to tell whether Shammi Thilakan and Biju Menon are more suited to military roles than Mukesh or Kunjan. The latter 2 have more scope for comedy than combat.

I was not comparing Mammoty to Mohanlal as I said thats really diffficult due to the vast differences in requirements for both characters.

I know that this will be a volatile issue but when u said Nair Saab is better than KC, I said KC is better than Nair Saab. We both have the right to express our own opinions.

Aravind Mohan Krishnan · 09-03-2006, 03:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HISHAMEM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Aravind Mohan Krishnan

My comparison of Nair Saab v Keerthi Chakra

I was waiting for such a topic to compare both films.

Both are very difficult to compare because

1. Both came in different eras
2. Mammoty is not a general throughout like Mohanlal
3. Mammoty and Mohanlal's characters have different styles and are characterised differently-so impossible to compare them
4. Keerthi Chakra can be called a military film. But Nair Saab is more of an action thriller in the 2nd half rather than a military film.

If I were to state my opinion, I would go for Keerthi Chakra for the following reasons

1. A true military film should NOT have unnecessary comedy or love scenes (Aran has that, but KC I am talking about..). In Nair Saab a few scenes are wasted on the usual young soldiers flirting with ladies and competition as to who is the most handsome, etc etc.
2. A true national military film will NEVER have a whole batch of Malayalees, the Home Secretary being a Malayalee and the chief villains being Malayalees. One has to be realistic here. Also, in Mukesh's dream, the India-Pakistan signs are in Malayalam

. In Keerthi Chakra, there are Tamilians, Maharashtrians and Afghanis and Kashmiris all speaking their various languages. This is what should happen. And unlike Nair Saab, a good 20% of Keerthi Chakra's dialogues are in Tamil, Hindi and Urdu.
3. A true military film will never ever have Mukesh, Kunjan, Maniyanpilla Raju as soldiers

. Biju Menon, Shammi Thilakan, Jeeva etc are more suitable for the military uniform than the others.
4. A true military film should be an army film throughout. In Nair Saab, 20% of the 1st half is comedy and romance and 80% of the 2nd half is action and suspense. In Keerthi Chakra, 90% of the film is devoted to training and commando operations and tactics.
5. A true military film should have atleast some patriotic dialogues and words to remember, eg where Major Mahadevan says "Yudham kalikumbozhum cricket kalikannumbol mathram nammal Indiakar avila". Nair Saab does not even have 1 patriotic dialogue or even "Bharat Mata Ki Jai"
6. A true military film should deal with issues in the military rather than outside. In Nair Saab u have the army being infiltrated by villains and Lalu Alex acting as a general, whereas in KC there are more pertinent issues such as the human rights of killing a prisoner, the sacrifices a soldier makes, none of which are dealt with in Nair Saab.
7. In Nair Saab soldiers do not have an identity to speak of themselves. In KC each soldier has his complex mannerisms and we can have a detailed look at the problems he faces. In Nair Saab soldiers follow the general (Mammoty or Lalu Alex)

Some points in favor of Nair Saab

1. Kashmir has been captured brilliantly even though it is 1989.
2. Though not a military film as such the suspense and action is racy and entertaining
3. Mammoty is outstanding as Nair Saab and his performance can really intimidate the audience. His dialogues are brilliant and he ssymbolises a true major.
4. The training manouvres are interesting to see in Nair Saab.

So I feel KC as a military film is better. My own opinion only. Sorry to Mammotyfans.

STILL U DIDNT REPLY TO MY REAL QUESTION REGARDING MAJOR RAVI 'S COPYING OF SOME SCENES AND CHARACTERS FROM OTHER MILITARY MOVIES LIKLE BORDER, SAVING PRIVATE RYAN. SAME MISTAKE OF NAAIR SAAB IS REPEATING KEERTHI CHAKRA ALSO. ALMOST TOP OFFICIALS LIKE SAIKUMAR, SPADIKAM GEORGE ARE MALAYALEES. NO REPLY REGARDING SANUSHA SPEAKING MALAYALAM FLUENTLY. I ALSO MENTIONED LANGUAGE PROBLEMS REGARDING 90'S . NO REPLY TO THAT ONE ALSO. AND WHAT U MEAN BY TRUE MILITARY FILMS NEVER EVER LIKE KUNJAN , MUKESH. DONT BLAME -THAT SEEMS CHILDISH COMMENT.LIKE KAIRALI SAYING SAKSHI SAYING BIJUMENON UM SHAMMITHILAKANUM KOMBUNDO. IF UARE SAYING LIKE THIS I CAN ALSO SAY THAT MOHANLAL'S BODY STRUCTURE ALSO NOT SUITABLE FOR ARMY OFFICER .U DIDNT REPLY REGARDING ADDING OF UNNECESSARY FIGHT SCENES IN THE FILMS. AND NAAIRSAAB'S CLIMAX IS FAR BETTER THAN KEERTHICHAKRA. FROM WHERE U GOT THE DEFINITION OF TRUE MILITARY FILM. BORDER IS CONSIDERED AS BEST MILITARY FILM IN INDIA, STILL THAT FILM IS MIXTURE OF ROMANCE, COMEDY AND ACTION.
NAAIR SAAB AND MAJOR MAADEVAN DOING THE SAME THING SAVING THE COUNTRY FROM TERRORISTS. I AND ABOUT SEVENTH POINT IF U CHECK NAAIR SAAB ALSO WE CAN FIND THAT IT ALSO PICTURISING THE DIFIICULTIES OF SOLDIERS, LIKE THAT OF SURESH GOPI, MUKESH, VIJAYARAGHAVAN ETC

Fair enough. There are a lot of Mallus in KC. But its a Malayalam military film. What do u expect? The army batch is mixed with Mallus and Tamilians and the villains are Afghanis and Kashmiris. If u point out Sanusha is a Malayalee than what is there for the two leading ladies (Lizzie is one..) in Nair Saab. Will a daughter of a brigadier go with him to Kashmir? In most cases I dont think so. More appropriate is Jeeva's case where his entire family stays in Chennai (they speak Tamil as should be)

GK · 09-03-2006, 03:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by deepak

Hi friends, nice topic. But I dont think KC can be compared to NS. Nair Saab is not at all a military movie. It is just a film taken in a military background. It doesnt deal with the actual problems that our nation is facing. Its a masala mix, remember the comedy scenes of Mukesh and party. Such scenes can be seen in overproportion in NS. Maybe they did that eyeing commercial success. But KC is a film that deals exclusively with the issue of terrorism. The film successfully gives the viewer a description of the situation in Kashmir and the problems faced by the soldiers. The dialogues are also very revealing, for example, there is this dialogue by a terrorist 'We dont consider Indian muslims as muslims'. Such dialogues are really crisp and the viewer can identify with the film easily. NS doesnt have even a single dialogue that is touchy. We dont get a feeling of patriotism after watching NS. In KC the guns and machinery used are original. We can feel the difference in action scenes. The encounter scenes are perfect lasting no more than 3-4 minutes. In terms of action scenes NS is just average. Nothing new about it. Performance wise, i think Mohanlal and Mammoty are on par. But Mohanlal can be better than Mammoty in action scenes as we all know that Mammoty cannot match Mohanlal in stunts. Before the movie was released Mammoty fans were booing Mohanlal saying that he cant do such a role. But Mohanlal came up with an excellent performance. He handles all the languages with ease and his dialogue delivery is fantastic. And about the bulky physique of Mohanlal, we have to remember that military is not about appearance. Its all about intelligence and quickness. Mohanlal was very fast in his encounter movements. So there is no point crtitisising him on his physique. Remember that the physicaly fit Mammoty didnt do anything better in action scenes of NS compared to Mohanlal in KC. And the success of KC is more superior to that of NS. Remember that in KC except Mohanlal there is no other prominent malayalam star who are crowd pullers. But NS is packed with prominent stars like Mukesh, Suresh, LaluALex, Devan, Raju etc. On the whole, NS cannot be compared to KC. KC is rooted in reality much more than NS.

WHAT U MEAN BY PROMINENT STARS.ON WHAT BASIS U ARE TELLING MUKESH , SURESHGOPI LALU ALEX ARE PROMINENT ACTORS THAN JEEVA, BIJU MENON , SHAMMITTHILAKAN, COCHIN HANEEFA , SAIKUMAR. PLEASE AVOID THIS TYPE OF RUBBISH COMMENTS. EVN KEERTHI CHAKRA HAVING SOME UNNECESSARY MASALA SCENES ( UNNECESSARY RAPE SCENES) AND SOME UNWANTED FIGHTS KEERTHICHAKRA'S TAMIL REMAKE FAILED IN TAMIL BOX OFFICE WHEREAS WHEN NAAIRSAAB DUBBED IN TAMIL, IT WAS BIG HIT. THAT MEANS TAMILANS APPRECIATED JOSHI'S TECHNICAL PERFECTION THAN THAT OF MAJOR RAVI. AND THAT OF MAMOOTY'S ACTING THAN MOHANLAL . EVEN MOHANLAL'S BIBLE SIFY CRITICISED THAT VULGAR RAPE SCENE IN KEERTHICHAKRA

lalistheonlysuperstar · 09-03-2006, 03:53 PM

border climax scene and some fighting scene is not good. No reality in it. Even some military person told this can not happen anymore.

Thats why and i will believe KC is the best Military movie in india